manderson
03-04 10:47 AM
i think u will be covered under the new NC>180 policy so u can also send a demand letter through your lawyer after March 10, 08 (i am inferring this from updated FAQs for NC>180: pls see that FAQ for more info).
if u want to find out about NC status, call 18003755283. Press
1
2
2
6
1
enter receipt number
1
1
keep listening to updates on case
3
4 you will be connecting to 2nd Level IO
if u want to find out about NC status, call 18003755283. Press
1
2
2
6
1
enter receipt number
1
1
keep listening to updates on case
3
4 you will be connecting to 2nd Level IO
wallpaper viking tattoo designs. draw a
krishna_brc
10-21 02:54 AM
I am in 6th year of my H1B. It is expiring in Aug 2011.
Here are some details:
- My I-140 is approved with a priority date of Aug 2006 under EB2-India.
- I did not apply for I-485 so I do not have a EAD.
- My wife is also on H1B which expires in Aug 2012.
Here are my questions:
1) If I apply for H1B extension in July 2011 under regular processing and assuming it takes 4-5 months for USCIS to process the application, can I still continue to work? For how many days can I work if visa renewal is still in processing after the visa has expired.
2) If I get a denial of H1B extension do I become out of status from the date of denial or from the day H1B got expired?
3) If I get a denial of H1B extension can I immediately apply for H4 as a dependent to my wife's visa without any issues?
4) If I get a denial of H1B extension, what happens to my I-140? Is it automatically invalid?
5) If I do convert to H4 status and my priority date becomes current can I apply for I-485?
Chances are very high that your priority date will be current before Aug 2011.
good luck
Here are some details:
- My I-140 is approved with a priority date of Aug 2006 under EB2-India.
- I did not apply for I-485 so I do not have a EAD.
- My wife is also on H1B which expires in Aug 2012.
Here are my questions:
1) If I apply for H1B extension in July 2011 under regular processing and assuming it takes 4-5 months for USCIS to process the application, can I still continue to work? For how many days can I work if visa renewal is still in processing after the visa has expired.
2) If I get a denial of H1B extension do I become out of status from the date of denial or from the day H1B got expired?
3) If I get a denial of H1B extension can I immediately apply for H4 as a dependent to my wife's visa without any issues?
4) If I get a denial of H1B extension, what happens to my I-140? Is it automatically invalid?
5) If I do convert to H4 status and my priority date becomes current can I apply for I-485?
Chances are very high that your priority date will be current before Aug 2011.
good luck
JazzByTheBay
08-01 08:48 PM
You can call USCIS if you don't hear from them within 90 days of filing EAD. Many of you probably know this already, but I thought that was interesting... and may benefit those who didn't know this already.
jazz
If Your Case Is Outside Our Current Processing Time (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=66f70531eaa9e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=a9243529fdb7e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190a RCRD)
If you filed a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, and it has been longer than 90 days since you filed and you haven't gotten an update from us within the last 60 days, and have not seen any public notice that addresses your case type, please don't wait the extra 30 days. Call customer service immediately.
jazz
If Your Case Is Outside Our Current Processing Time (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=66f70531eaa9e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=a9243529fdb7e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190a RCRD)
If you filed a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, and it has been longer than 90 days since you filed and you haven't gotten an update from us within the last 60 days, and have not seen any public notice that addresses your case type, please don't wait the extra 30 days. Call customer service immediately.
2011 pictures lack and white tattoo
Better_Days
01-08 01:17 PM
Nothing positive? Check this out:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22242
There were those who got their I-140 cleared under EB2 and were practically jumping with joy at the door closing behind them. Some were even taking credit for the move :)
That would be devastating! I dont see any positives out of that move.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22242
There were those who got their I-140 cleared under EB2 and were practically jumping with joy at the door closing behind them. Some were even taking credit for the move :)
That would be devastating! I dont see any positives out of that move.
more...
bigboy007
11-17 06:22 PM
I have received FP notices both for my wife and myself for both 485 & 765. Code 3 ,2 . The question is :I dont know how FP process works. My wife has very smooth and sweaty hands. When i applied for Canadian immigration during FBI FP process even after n no. of attempts we couldnt get good prints on FP Sheet using INK. Ofcourse through speaking with Canadian Consulate they gave her an exemption over this. Now many of my friends have informed me that FP process is Electronic is this true?
I think she has no problem with electronic FP as US consulate could take her FP's when initially she went for H4 in i ndia. please comment.
I think she has no problem with electronic FP as US consulate could take her FP's when initially she went for H4 in i ndia. please comment.
alex99
10-31 04:38 PM
From THE OH LAW FIRM:
USCIS is scheduled to publish a revised regulation tomorrow removing the 485 Original Receipt Notice requirement for the H and L nonimmigrants traveling and returning to the U.S. pending the 485 proceedings
USCIS is scheduled to publish a revised regulation tomorrow removing the 485 Original Receipt Notice requirement for the H and L nonimmigrants traveling and returning to the U.S. pending the 485 proceedings
more...
akr_roy
09-21 11:13 AM
I received the receipts and FP notice. Waiting for EAD/AP.
PD: OCT2006 TSC
RD: 24th July 2007 TSC
ND: 12th Sep 2007 TSC
PD: OCT2006 TSC
RD: 24th July 2007 TSC
ND: 12th Sep 2007 TSC
2010 Warrior Tattoo Designs Warrior
RadioactveChimp
04-08 02:07 AM
ahhhhhh sweet approval
more...
voldemar
04-30 05:32 PM
Is letter from employee needed for filing I-485 for my spouse. I filed I-485 under EB3 last August and it's still pending. She takes my PD and my PD will be current in May. I have an old letter from my employer when filing my I-485 last August but was wondering if a new letter from employer is needed or the old one would do.
No, no need.
No, no need.
hair white tattoo designs black
qasleuth
04-27 10:38 AM
Here is some info on RFEs in general
http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/Request_For_Evidence
http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/Request_For_Evidence
more...
vaishnavilakshmi
06-22 08:18 PM
Two I140 in process with a difference of one years in the priority date (one original and one recently filled substitution with improved PD). Which I-140 should be used for I485. IF PD goes back to retrogration, the substitution would help with a risk of getting reject as well. The original I140 has less risk but if PD goes in retrogration, it might get years to get I-485 approve. Suggestions?
hi,
we are in the same boat and our lawyer also say the same!
vaishu
hi,
we are in the same boat and our lawyer also say the same!
vaishu
hot hairstyles cool tattoo designs
uppaji
04-05 04:17 PM
And provided their offices information about retrogression and IV. They aeemed to be very familiar with this issue.
more...
house Your Own Tattoo Design
dingudi
02-22 11:04 AM
Hi,
I know there has been lot of discussions on things to do and not to do after changing jobs - but seems like there is no definitive conclusion. Thought of getting opinion on following:
(i) Generally people suggest to send G28 to change the lawyer representation - this helps in tracking what is going on without missing any RFE's.
(ii) Regarding AC21 letter informing USCIS there are contradicting advice even from lawyers - some say that dont do anything until they issue an RFE. Thinking here is that we would attract USCIS attention by sending an AC21 letter that could potentially delay. By not sending the letter they might just approve without any questions.
Based on this, I initially thought of sending just G28 but not AC21 letter. But once we send G28 to change lawyer representation, my application get USCIS's attention anyway - so I am thinking why not send AC21 letter as well as a back up.
Any opinions?
Thanks.
You may want to change lawyers for many reasons including personal dissatisfaction, lawyers messing up, high fees , and more... I do not think this will attract so much attention in comparison.Just my thought.
I know there has been lot of discussions on things to do and not to do after changing jobs - but seems like there is no definitive conclusion. Thought of getting opinion on following:
(i) Generally people suggest to send G28 to change the lawyer representation - this helps in tracking what is going on without missing any RFE's.
(ii) Regarding AC21 letter informing USCIS there are contradicting advice even from lawyers - some say that dont do anything until they issue an RFE. Thinking here is that we would attract USCIS attention by sending an AC21 letter that could potentially delay. By not sending the letter they might just approve without any questions.
Based on this, I initially thought of sending just G28 but not AC21 letter. But once we send G28 to change lawyer representation, my application get USCIS's attention anyway - so I am thinking why not send AC21 letter as well as a back up.
Any opinions?
Thanks.
You may want to change lawyers for many reasons including personal dissatisfaction, lawyers messing up, high fees , and more... I do not think this will attract so much attention in comparison.Just my thought.
tattoo Biomechanical tattoo design
indianabacklog
03-22 11:22 PM
Hello everybody ! I am 22 years old. My parents had applied for GC under the employment based category. I, unfortunately, aged out before my parents applied I-140 because of the stupid backlogs. So I aged out even before an I-140 was filed. I was reading the Child protection act info and could not understand if I will be "automatically classified to the appropriate category" for GC which is Family 2B and retain my "original PD." Does this apply to me as I had not even filed I-140 when I aged out ? My parent's PD is Oct 2000 so does this mean I am under Family 2B with Oct 2000 PD ?? Please help me out. I am sure many of you with sons/daughters that are in a similar situation. Thanks
My son also aged out before my I140 was filed. I was told that he would not be able to keep the same priority date and it would be fixed by the date when I could apply for his family based application. So, if I were to file an I130 next week his priority date would be March 2008.
In order for the priority date to be fixed at the point when labor certification was applied for the I140 would have to be submitted before his 21st birthday and be approved within a time period that could be deducted from his age at time of approval, making him under 21 at that time.
The child status protection act is pretty useless to children in your position or my son's since the big delay occurred in the labor cert stage.
If however, you can find a different interpretation of this situation feel free to send me a personal message and I will follow through as well.
There are a number of members in IV whose children aged out so while this is not a prevalent subject matter it is one that affects more people than you might realize.
My son also aged out before my I140 was filed. I was told that he would not be able to keep the same priority date and it would be fixed by the date when I could apply for his family based application. So, if I were to file an I130 next week his priority date would be March 2008.
In order for the priority date to be fixed at the point when labor certification was applied for the I140 would have to be submitted before his 21st birthday and be approved within a time period that could be deducted from his age at time of approval, making him under 21 at that time.
The child status protection act is pretty useless to children in your position or my son's since the big delay occurred in the labor cert stage.
If however, you can find a different interpretation of this situation feel free to send me a personal message and I will follow through as well.
There are a number of members in IV whose children aged out so while this is not a prevalent subject matter it is one that affects more people than you might realize.
more...
pictures koi tattoo design
sabithanair84
04-21 11:52 AM
Currently on H4 and validity expires on 09/23/2010. Can be applied for extension when principal applicants H1B is being extended(from his company), but since I have my H1B case filed with USCIS, will it create any conflict if I apply for H4 extension now? (ideally for 7 days (23rd sept to 30th sept) !! 'coz if approved, H1B status becomes valid from Oct 1st, right? )
Also, is there any rule which states that, when a case is pending with USCIS, legally you are not supposed to leave the country?
Thanks in advance,
Sabitha
Also, is there any rule which states that, when a case is pending with USCIS, legally you are not supposed to leave the country?
Thanks in advance,
Sabitha
dresses Tattoo Designs middot; Drawing Coach
DallasBlue
07-31 08:23 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=102776
Washington Evaluation Services (Washington Evaluation Service)
210 Justice Ct Ne, Washington, DC 20002-5755, United States (Map) (Add Company Info)
Phone: (202) 543-2595
Contact Name:Terry Erb
you can also try:
Trustforte ( www.trustforte.com)
good luck
--disclaimer: just personal view, do your research.
Washington Evaluation Services (Washington Evaluation Service)
210 Justice Ct Ne, Washington, DC 20002-5755, United States (Map) (Add Company Info)
Phone: (202) 543-2595
Contact Name:Terry Erb
you can also try:
Trustforte ( www.trustforte.com)
good luck
--disclaimer: just personal view, do your research.
more...
makeup Skull Tattoos Designs.
Blog Feeds
06-03 03:40 PM
VIA AILA
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Wednesday, June 3, 2009CONTACT:
George Tzamaras
202-507-7649
<a href="mailto:" gtzamaras@aila.org"="" style="color: rgb(51, 102, 153); ">gtzamaras@aila.org
ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER RESTORES DUE PROCESS FOR IMMIGRANTS INJURED BY INEFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION:
AILA praises decision by Attorney General to withdraw Matter of Compean.
WASHINGTON, DC*� The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) welcomes the restoration of due process in the Immigration Court system. Attorney General Eric Holder today withdrew the decision issued by former Attorney General Mukasey on the last day of the Bush Administration, which had eviscerated the right to effective representation in Immigration Court proceedings. Attorney General Holder had stated during his confirmation process that he would review the Mukasey decision and that he disagreed with its reasoning. AILA is grateful for this restoration of a basic constitutional process�Due Process, in the immigration court system.
AILA commends Attorney General Holder for living up to his word, and for his clarity of understanding of not only the constitutional principle of due process, but also for the boldness with which he acted today. �The restoration of the prior standard for claiming ineffective representation in immigration court proceedings is a welcome sign that the Obama administration understands that the rights that apply to the least of us, apply to all of us,� said Charles H. Kuck, president of AILA. �By ensuring that immigrants seeking relief from the harsh consequences of deportation are assured that they will not be punished by the ineffective actions of their counsel, Attorney General Holder has reset the standard that the Constitution ensures. Today�s action, along with the other positive signs from the Administration signal that a restoration of our most sacred principles of justice has begun.�
###The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/06/03/aila-praises-decision-by-attorney-general-to-withdraw-matter-of-compean.aspx?ref=rss)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Wednesday, June 3, 2009CONTACT:
George Tzamaras
202-507-7649
<a href="mailto:" gtzamaras@aila.org"="" style="color: rgb(51, 102, 153); ">gtzamaras@aila.org
ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER RESTORES DUE PROCESS FOR IMMIGRANTS INJURED BY INEFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION:
AILA praises decision by Attorney General to withdraw Matter of Compean.
WASHINGTON, DC*� The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) welcomes the restoration of due process in the Immigration Court system. Attorney General Eric Holder today withdrew the decision issued by former Attorney General Mukasey on the last day of the Bush Administration, which had eviscerated the right to effective representation in Immigration Court proceedings. Attorney General Holder had stated during his confirmation process that he would review the Mukasey decision and that he disagreed with its reasoning. AILA is grateful for this restoration of a basic constitutional process�Due Process, in the immigration court system.
AILA commends Attorney General Holder for living up to his word, and for his clarity of understanding of not only the constitutional principle of due process, but also for the boldness with which he acted today. �The restoration of the prior standard for claiming ineffective representation in immigration court proceedings is a welcome sign that the Obama administration understands that the rights that apply to the least of us, apply to all of us,� said Charles H. Kuck, president of AILA. �By ensuring that immigrants seeking relief from the harsh consequences of deportation are assured that they will not be punished by the ineffective actions of their counsel, Attorney General Holder has reset the standard that the Constitution ensures. Today�s action, along with the other positive signs from the Administration signal that a restoration of our most sacred principles of justice has begun.�
###The American Immigration Lawyers Association is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/06/03/aila-praises-decision-by-attorney-general-to-withdraw-matter-of-compean.aspx?ref=rss)
girlfriend Egyptian Tattoo Designs,
seemashah
02-21 05:29 PM
usually a CPA can give an audited report ...or the bank auditors can
Is the company a Corp, LLC or sole prop?
>>The company is a Corporation. Can any CPA give an audit report... can you be more elaborative about the process of getting audited report... like what are we supposed to provide the CPA to get the audit report...
Is the company a Corp, LLC or sole prop?
>>The company is a Corporation. Can any CPA give an audit report... can you be more elaborative about the process of getting audited report... like what are we supposed to provide the CPA to get the audit report...
hairstyles Tribal Ambigram Tattoo Design
Prashanthi
08-21 01:39 PM
My wife is currently on H4 and she is planning to apply for Residency here in the US on an exchange visa (J1). Let us suppose that she gets her status adjusted here in the US from H4 to J1 and then travels outside the US (say India). Then, she would have to get a J1 visa stamped on her passport. Considering that her spouse (that's me) would be on H1B, it would be rather difficult for her to prove that she would return to India. Do you think there is a greater chance of denial of J1 visa to her at the US consulate? If yes, how do you recommend we go about doing it? Your answer would be appreciated.
------------------------------
LC and I-140 Approved; EB2 PD 22 Feb 2008
The red flag is usually raised when one has immediate relatives who are Citizens or Green card holders. If you have a spouse who is on H-1 it does not mean that you intend to immigrate to the United States. However, the fact that you filed for an immigrant petition might effect her visa application adversely, the consulate is capable of rejecting for any reason and no judicial review exists if the visa is rejected. Good luck.
------------------------------
LC and I-140 Approved; EB2 PD 22 Feb 2008
The red flag is usually raised when one has immediate relatives who are Citizens or Green card holders. If you have a spouse who is on H-1 it does not mean that you intend to immigrate to the United States. However, the fact that you filed for an immigrant petition might effect her visa application adversely, the consulate is capable of rejecting for any reason and no judicial review exists if the visa is rejected. Good luck.
SlowRoasted
05-22 10:14 PM
i dont like where the money text is. should be in one of the corners.
Circus123
10-27 09:07 AM
For 485 you do indeed need to be in the US (for yoiu adjust status, you need to be in some status in the US). However for I-140 you need not be in the US. Can you point to any law or any link on any forum that says you need to be present for filing the I-140?
The complete GC process can be done without ever entering the US (do LC, file I-140, then do Consular processing for the final stage)
Thanks for the insightful info...
The complete GC process can be done without ever entering the US (do LC, file I-140, then do Consular processing for the final stage)
Thanks for the insightful info...
No comments:
Post a Comment